HCR "A dish of snow"
Table of Contents
-
Project Data
-
Slide Presentation
-
Analysis based on Making and Knowing Wiki Reconstruction Template
-
Goal
-
Title analysis
-
Recipe analysis
Name:
Ariane van Buren and Hannah Elmer
Date and Time: 2017.1.25, 11:00am (together), 2017.1.30, 8:00am (repeated alone)
Location: 407 Central Park West #7c, Ariane's kitchen
Subject: How to make a dish of snow
Analysis Using Wiki Reconstruction Template:
Overarching goal:
-
What are we trying to find out?
"With a partner, cook a dish based on a recipe found in a sixteenth- or seventeenth-century book or manuscript
to decipher and concoct." We are seeking to discover through experience, the wording of a recipe, the ingredients used, the measurements used, the procedure, the product, and, in the case of the recipe for "A Dishe of Snow", the presentation of the product.
-
What level of authenticity are we striving for in a given reconstruction
"As much as possible, [we tried] to simulate early modern ingredients, apparatus, and methods."
-
How accurate can we be not knowing what the end result should actually look like?
-
We can simply be as clear as possible in our choices of ingredients and our estimations of the measurements and procedure. The degree of accuracy was a function not only of not knowing the end result, but also of not having made the recipe before, and that product being unknown in our present day eating habits.
-
How do we mediate between allowing process to unfold and striving for a preconceived end-goal? PROCESS vs. PRODUCT!!
We did not attempt to "mediate between allowing process to
unfold
and striving for a preconceived goal".. Rather, we followed and recorded the process as it occurred, got the product we did, and sought to make the presentation look like snow on a bush and also look appealing.
-
We learn by filtering out our preconceptions as best we can
We discussed our preconceptions, challenged each other's, and then I repeated the recipe correcting our preconceptions.
-
Are recipes included in compilations because they are meant to convey something new or because they are thought worth recording?
I believe this recipe appears the cook book because it was probably a common dish which people wanted to make. Ken Albala refers to the "ubiquitous" recipes for "snow".
-
Situate the recipe within a historical context
-
E.g., when we have to improvise methods to measure, interpret, understand, how might early moderners have made similar improvisations?
For example, the measurement of a "dish" was unspecified, but recurred in the recipe, so we made certain to use the same dish. We assumed it would not be a large one, as a smaller plate was presumably more common than a large one, easier to make out of ceramics, wood, or pewter, and less costly.
One other unusual measurement was a "pottle". We guessed it was half a cup, but then looked it up online and found it to be 2 quarts!
Title analysis:
A sweet white foam, which when cast upon a branch, looks a bit like an accumulation of heavy snow.
-
Where is the recipe coming from?
-
__A Book of Cookrye__
(England, 1591) [See
__here__
for a transcription]
Source?
"
gathered by A. W.
"
"
all such as delight therein"/ gathered by A. W. And now newlye enlarged with the serving in of the table. With the proper sauces to each of them convenient
"
"
And now newlye enlarged with the serving in of the table. With the proper sauces to each of them convenient
"
Recipe analysis:
-
How are the ingredients deployed in the recipe? All together? Peppered throughout? Importance of reading the whole recipe multiple times.
Interspersed with the steps of the procedure.
-
What about sequence of directions and ingredients - is the recipe presented sequentially, or do things happen out of order?
Sequentially.
-
How is the text of the recipe broken up?
It is not broken up and consists of one short paragraph.
-
What does this tell us about how the practice/process should take place?
The process is presumably straightforward and takes place quickly in one stage.
-
How do we interpret ambiguous antecedents, articles, prepositions, action verbs, etc.? Variant spellings?
-
Purpose-designed equipment vs. multi-purpose tools
-
E.g., what to make of “unit-less” fractions, ambiguously sized vessels, etc.
-
How do technological changes impact our interpretation/expectation of the recipes? (e.g., ceramic vs. metal vessels)
-
How do environmental conditions impact the recipe?
-
Re: equipment/implements: metals/alloys (e.g. possible differences between vessels that are ‘lead lined,’ or ceramic, or copper, or pewter vs. what is generally available in current culinary use - aluminum, stainless steel)
-
Questions of precision and ambiguity
-
precision vs.close following of the recipe
-
ambiguity vs. flexibility of a recipe
-
How often are tools specified?
-
How are measurements actually done? Emphasis on ratios over standardized units
-
How does this relate to the overall quantities specified in a recipe? Scalable
-
What impact do translations/interpretations have on reconstruction?
-
How do the motivations behind historical recipes relate to modern motivations?
-
E.g., do early modern diseases/problems resemble modern ones? And how do such underpinning assumptions impact our reconstructions?
-
There is a surprising continuity of materials and techniques over time
-
What is the stability of a material over time?
-
E.g., eggs now vs. eggs then
-
How common is the assumed knowledge required to follow a recipe?
Name:
(Also the name of your working partner)
Date and Time:
2016.[Month].[Day], [hh]:[mm][am/pm]
Location:
Subject:
Name:
(Also the name of your working partner)
Date and Time:
2016.[Month].[Day], [hh]:[mm][am/pm]
Location:
Subject:
ASPECTS TO KEEP IN MIND WHEN MAKING FIELD NOTES
-
note time
-
note (changing) conditions in the room
-
note temperature of ingredients to be processed (e.g. cold from fridge, room temperature etc.)
-
document materials, equipment, and processes in writing and with photographs
-
notes on ingredients and equipment (where did you get them? issues of authenticity)
-
note precisely the scales and temperatures you used (please indicate how you interpreted imprecise recipe instruction)
-
see also our
informal template for recipe reconstructions